Tag Archives: Mueller

The Great One Has Spoken!!! ⁦

by



Source:
The Great One Has Spoken!!! ⁦

Let’s Say a Reporter (Real One) was Subpoenaed by Left-Leaning Committee

by

I was reading, “Barr spars with Nadler, threatens to skip testimony after dispute over hearing format” and became both agitated and amused.  This is some crazy stuff we are witnessing and I felt an overwhelming need to share the analogy that immediately came to mind.

Let’s say a reporter (real one) read the police report of a robbery & reported on it.  Reported strictly on what the report itself said.  No opinion.  No assumption.  Simply reported what was reported to law enforcement.

A suspect was arrested.

The reporter (real one) simply reported a suspect was arrested.

The suspect appeared at a hearing.

The D.A. stepped forward & asked that the suspect be released and all charges dismissed.  D.A. stated evidence had been found that this person was not guilty of the robbery after all.  The judge agreed & charges were dismissed.

The reporter (real one) reports:

“The D.A. stepped forward & asked that the suspect be released and all charges dismissed.  D.A. stated evidence had been found that this person was not guilty of the robbery after all.  The judge agreed & charges were dismissed.”

The left-leaning Committee becomes outraged. 

How dare the D.A. state there was evidence the suspect was not guilty?

How dare the D.A. ask for a dismissal of charges?

How dare the judge agree?

How dare the reporter (real one) report what transpired?

The Committee, after all, knows the suspect must be guilty.  It’s declared that the evidence is in plain-sight.  Some say they have seen it.  Many declare the suspect and reporter must be removed from their jobs.  There must be transparency – they will have a hearing and call the reporter (real one).  Yes, they are sure, they claim, they will expose the reporter’s (real one’s) attempted cover-up, find a way to make the suspect guilty and thereby over-ride the D.A. and judge.

The reporter (real one) was subpoenaed to the hearing.

It was obvious the Committee was hostile and determined to challenge the reporter’s (real one’s) integrity and right to continue in their position.

The reporter (real one) states upfront that they have no idea why they were asked to appear before the committee.  They weren’t involved in the crime, the reporting of it to the police, the investigation, the outcome of that investigation, the D.A. deciding to request a dismissal or what evidence he was talking about, nor the judge’s decision.  All they – the reporter (real one) – had done was to report what had transpired with nothing added or deleted, including personal commentary, especially regarding the evidence, individuals involved, or results thereof.

A robbery happened.

It was investigated.

A suspect was arrested.

A suspect went to court.

The D.A. stated further evidence proved they had the wrong person.

The D.A. asked for dismissal.

The judge agreed to the dismissal.

What part of that was the reporter (real one) responsible for? 

What part did the reporter (real one) influence in some way?

How is the reporter (real one) lacking in integrity?

How is the reporter (real one) being dishonest?

All of that being irrelevant to the Committee, they demanded the reporter (real one) present everything involved in the incident, investigation & conclusions to them.  The reporter (real one) reminded them that they already had access to all that information, excluding anything by law the officers & D.A. were not allowed to share.

Committee members, as often seen, postured during the hearing and afterwards rushed to appear in front of the cameras.  The reporter (real one), they claim with such righteous indignation, hadn’t been forthcoming with them and denied them the reports they needed to fully investigate the case and provide the public with the facts.

Okay.

The reporter (real one) – whose only part in this entire situation was to report on the actions and findings of others – is suddenly not forthcoming and hiding information from the Committee?  Information that they already have or can readily obtain?

Insanity comes to mind.

Attorney General Barr, did not hire the team to investigate the Russian interference, nor did he prepare the investigation summary and conclusion.  That was Mueller & Team.

(The reporter (real one) reporting the actions and conclusion of those handling the case.)

Attorney General Barr, did not alter anything.  He presented the report “AS IS” with only redaction of information not allowed to be readily shared.

(The reporter (real one) reporting the actions and conclusion of those handling the case.)

Attorney General Barr, was left to conclude one aspect.  Did anything the President do appear to actually be obstruction?  No.  It didn’t.  (A conclusion based on the information the Mueller Team presented.)

(The judge agreeing with the D.A.’s findings.)

The left-leaning Committees apparently don’t like Mueller & Team’s conclusions that President Trump neither engaged in collusion nor obstruction, so they are going to proceed with further investigation, until they can find something… anything… to blame him for?  And, part of their plan is to take down Barr for daring to report what transpired and what Mueller concluded as a result thereof?

Yes, insanity, or perhaps corruption and lack of actual integrity on the part of those participating in the dishonesty, crazy behavior and out-in-left field allegations are possibilities we should wonder about, shouldn’t we?  It matters not which.  What is transpiring is not what we should expect from rational adults, especially ones in control of the lives of others and our country.

A.G. Barr is guilty of nothing.

The left-leaning Committees, on the other hand, have much to answer for.

Copyright © 2019 Carrie K. Hutchens

Trump: Follow the Money

by

Source:
Twitter

Another Very Open Letter to the Apathetic Congress

by

Dear Apathetic Congress:

I’ve had it. Not only have I had it – there’s an over-flow of company crowded into this corner of opinion.

How can you sit there and fail to take action to remove Mueller from his apparent “free to do whatever he wants” position?

Mueller is making a mockery of the rule of law and so are you by your inaction.

In real life, where the rules count more, Mueller would not be allowed to proceed with all these OBVIOUS “in your face” conflicts of interest. And, no doubt, someone would have filed numerous ethic violation complaints on him, Comey & Rosenstein right at the onset. Yet, in your world of political calculation – you turn a blind eye to his inappropriateness and pretend not to hear us. How politician of you!

Maybe in the past, you were able to blow off the silent majority because they didn’t rock the boat too awfully bad, but times have changed. The silent majority is silent no more, as many have told you over the past year or so. They meant it. I mean it. It’s time you realize it.

You, by your inaction, are making a mockery of the rule of law. You are showing us that we have no reason to trust the system ruled over by the Federal government. You are showing us we have no reason to trust you.

The short of the story is…

Mueller should never have been appointed to anything, but he was.

Upon realization that Mueller does have a conflict – he should have been immediately removed.

You have thus far failed to do anything about correcting this error. That is not acceptable. It will never be acceptable.

Should you continue to ignore our rightful complaint about this wrong and wrongful behavior – you will have broken your oath of office and therefore – have no further right to be a member of Congress. Instead, you will be an accessory to any violation and law broken as a result of your failure to take appropriate action.

It’s up to you to do the right thing.

Will you?

Copyright © 2017 Carrie K. Hutchens

An Open Letter to Attorney General Sessions

by

Attorney General Jeff Sessions

Dear Attorney General Sessions:

It’s been a very long 9 years! Sometimes I wasn’t sure we’d make it until January 20, 2017 intact. Other times I wasn’t sure we had. There were actual violent riots – not protests. There were people seeking to undermine the election via long-shot technicalities they’d discovered in the system. And when that didn’t work… other attempts were made to DE-legitimize the election. It was a continual roller coaster ride to Inauguration Day, but even then – it didn’t stop.

Women with little pink hats decided to march. Some of the vulgarity and hate seen that day was beyond belief. Women disrespecting women claiming to be marching on behalf of women, was the irony of the day. Well, maybe not.

We learned that Linda Sarsour was one of the organizers of the pink hat march. You know… the woman that seems to believe in Sharia Law. A law that disrespects women.

Rasmea Odeh, another organizer of the women’s march was a convicted terrorist.

Donna Hylton, convicted in a murder-torture case, was a featured speaker at one of the marches.

And where were the pink hat women?

Gleefully following their new found leaders to the women’s rights slaughter house. A slaughter house that would strip them from any rights they think they have or would wish to have. Such irony.

Mr. Sessions, I bet you are wondering what this has to do with you.

It’s background, sir. Background of how insane our country had become and the madness we were forced to helplessly endure under the previous administration and DOJ watch.

Just when we thought law and order will be returned, because you have been sworn in – we are hit with even more upsetting events. We have to sit through the Russian collusion farce. Every day… all day long… seven days a week, we have to listen to how the Russians have interfered with the election and there are suspicions here and suspicions there, not to mention the suspicions over yonder that could mean this and could mean that and to the point of never ending-ness.

The beaut of the irony in the Russian saga is the appointment of Robert Mueller with all his conflicts compounded by the conflicts of members of the team he built.

Citizens call for the resignation or firing of Mueller and your DOJ ignores everyone. And as everyone is ignored, Mueller hires even more conflicted people. A big slap in the face of law and order and the citizens of the United States and you have done nothing. You have allowed it to be and continue to be. Why? What’s up?

I thought we had entered a new era with President Trump’s election and your appointment. I thought there would be honesty and justice returning to our country. Instead, we have witnessed members of Congress and head of FBI allow the public to wrongly believe there was an investigation of the president.

We hear alleged leaks that always throw suspicion on Trump or someone in his administration.

Where are the leaks that confirm nothing was found?

Where are the leaks that verify it is a Russian probe, rather than a Trump probe, and therefore others are being investigated for their possible ties?

Your DOJ let Lerner walk after her department harmed so many and perhaps affected the 2012 election. Why?

What is happening with Comey? Anything?

What is happening with Hillary? Anything?

What about Lynch? Does she get a free pass or will she be held accountable?

The DOJ went to Ferguson to investigate allegations of Civil Rights violations. Has it been investigating Antifa and it’s violent attacks, and promises of attacks, on people as it attempts to remove freedom of speech from any who don’t agree with them?

We continually see people investigated for hate crimes while usually being told that it can’t be a hate crime if done unto a white person. Really? It’s lawful to falsely accuse people of being white supremacists simply because they are white and call for the killing of them or all whites?

What about the threats against cops? How can we have law and order, if those who are to enforce law and order, are themselves targeted for extinction?

I could continue, but I do I need to?

We have lived through years of chaos.

We have lived through years of lies being spewed as truth.

We have lived through years of the bad guys and gals rising in status, while the good ones are trampled on and anointed as evil and stupid.

Yes, we have been living in an Orwellian world. A wrongful world situation we thought you would be quick to address. I guess we were wrong.

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you are intently and silently working on cases that have so horrifically affected our lives and our future. Perhaps you are but with the insult of Mueller getting a free pass on his conflict… without just one significant case being addressed – it gets really hard to go on believing law and order has returned.

Sometimes… just sometimes… it gets really hard to believe we can ever go back, if not to perfection, at least to a time of sanity.

I know your job is difficult, Mr. Sessions, and it serves no good purpose to indict without a case built well. But, sir, isn’t there something you are prepared to do so as to give us a sign our faith is well placed? Just one? Just something? Just a little assurance?

I have no doubt everyone has their own idea what would assure them you are working for us. Mine is firing Mueller and closing the Russian probe as in relationship to our president. It’s something that could be easily and readily done.

Opening a case on Antifa would be another good assurance that you are concerned with our well-being and that of our country and freedoms.

You could also…

So many things that could be done. So few that have been “obviously” done.

I’m sorry for taking up so much of your time, if you are truly working quietly in our behalf. However, please remember that all this chaos, insanity and injustice long ago began taking up our time and we have no clue when it might end even yet. That is partially – if not entirely – in your hands.

We await positive assurance by positive action.

Thank you in advance.