Maybe it is time to stop playing politics and stop playing on emotions to push through PERSONAL AGENDAS and start dealing with the REAL PROBLEMS involved.
Tag Archives: liberals
Colorado Sen. Evie Hudak’s concealed carry stats don’t apply in case
Where are these inaccurate statistics coming from?
Let’s hold the lawmakers accountable for the misinformation they are spreading!
The Sequester: Obama Then & Now
Whose fault was the sequester again?
Reid & The Obligation: The Insanity Continues
It’s Friday, March 1, 2013, and the insanity is still evolving.
From “Sen. Reid to Press: ‘You Guys Have an Obligation to Report’ the Democrats Are Right” by Elizabeth Harrington (CNSNews – Feb. 28, 2013):
During a news conference on Capitol Hill held on the eve of implementation of the cuts, known on Capitol Hill as “The Sequester,” a reporter asked Reid: “Can you understand the frustration of the American people that you’re blaming the Republicans, the Republicans are blaming you and nobody is talking until the day that these cuts kick in?”
Reid replied: “You know I read an editorial today, and I don’t know whether it was the Times or the Post, where the op-ed writer said, ‘You know, let’s call it the way it is. The Republicans aren’t willing to deal with the Democrats.
“So all this stuff–Democrats aren’t doing anything, Republicans aren’t doing anything–I believe that you guys have an obligation to report it the way it is,” he said.
“This isn’t something that happened yesterday, we’ve been fighting this for a couple years,” Reid added. “They’re unwilling to do what the American people want done. And it’s as simple as that.”
Yes, Senator Reid, it would be nice if the entire media reported things the way they are. You and Pelosi might just be out of a job and wondering what went wrong, if they did.
The Democrats readily dismiss budgets and plans proposed by Republicans and don’t pass a budget for how many years now, Mr. Reid? But it is the Republicans fault because they won’t do what the American people want? Really, we are to take your word? How about when you got up there and said that Romney needed to prove he paid taxes because he didn’t — yet he had? Maybe that little invisible friend of yours has told you wrong again.
The sequester idea came from Obama and his team, but to hear the campaign rhetoric, it would seem we are to forget that little bit of information and just blame the Republicans because they won’t do what Obama and followers want.
With regard to Bob Woodward’s disagreement with the White House, there is a statement that stands out:
“What does that matter now?” It matters a great deal when elected officials and their teams are trying to rewrite history and cast blame on others. Yes, that’s something that matters a great deal. So, just like with the fact that the White House should take responsibility for the sequester proposal — other Democrats like yourself, Mr. Reid, should take responsibility for your irresponsibility and lack of action in the past four or five years.
Where, Mr. Reid, is the passed budget that the law required and you ignored?
It is time that the lost media get back to journalism where one reports the facts, rather than blindly accepting the talking points of those who are trying to redefine our nation, rewrite history, cast blame on others, play down the inconvenient facts, insult and insinuate in the face of opposition, and rely upon selective polls that represent what they want them to represent.
Yes, Mr. Reid, you got one thing right. The media has an obligation to report on the facts and the tactics being utilized in Washington, D.C. Are you sure you are ready for that?
Reid & The Obligation: The Insanity Continues
It’s Friday, March 1, 2013, and the insanity is still evolving.
From “Sen. Reid to Press: ‘You Guys Have an Obligation to Report’ the Democrats Are Right” by Elizabeth Harrington (CNSNews – Feb. 28, 2013):
During a news conference on Capitol Hill held on the eve of implementation of the cuts, known on Capitol Hill as “The Sequester,” a reporter asked Reid: “Can you understand the frustration of the American people that you’re blaming the Republicans, the Republicans are blaming you and nobody is talking until the day that these cuts kick in?”
Reid replied: “You know I read an editorial today, and I don’t know whether it was the Times or the Post, where the op-ed writer said, ‘You know, let’s call it the way it is. The Republicans aren’t willing to deal with the Democrats.
“So all this stuff–Democrats aren’t doing anything, Republicans aren’t doing anything–I believe that you guys have an obligation to report it the way it is,” he said.
“This isn’t something that happened yesterday, we’ve been fighting this for a couple years,” Reid added. “They’re unwilling to do what the American people want done. And it’s as simple as that.”
Yes, Senator Reid, it would be nice if the entire media reported things the way they are. You and Pelosi might just be out of a job and wondering what went wrong, if they did.
The Democrats readily dismiss budgets and plans proposed by Republicans and don’t pass a budget for how many years now, Mr. Reid? But it is the Republicans fault because they won’t do what the American people want? Really, we are to take your word? How about when you got up there and said that Romney needed to prove he paid taxes because he didn’t — yet he had? Maybe that little invisible friend of yours has told you wrong again.
The sequester idea came from Obama and his team, but to hear the campaign rhetoric, it would seem we are to forget that little bit of information and just blame the Republicans because they won’t do what Obama and followers want.
With regard to Bob Woodward’s disagreement with the White House, there is a statement that stands out:
“What does that matter now?” It matters a great deal when elected officials and their teams are trying to rewrite history and cast blame on others. Yes, that’s something that matters a great deal. So, just like with the fact that the White House should take responsibility for the sequester proposal — other Democrats like yourself, Mr. Reid, should take responsibility for your irresponsibility and lack of action in the past four or five years.
Where, Mr. Reid, is the passed budget that the law required and you ignored?
It is time that the lost media get back to journalism where one reports the facts, rather than blindly accepting the talking points of those who are trying to redefine our nation, rewrite history, cast blame on others, play down the inconvenient facts, insult and insinuate in the face of opposition, and rely upon selective polls that represent what they want them to represent.
Yes, Mr. Reid, you got one thing right. The media has an obligation to report on the facts and the tactics being utilized in Washington, D.C. Are you sure you are ready for that?
Don’t Trust Women With Guns — Give Them Rape Free Zones Instead
Let’s see, who is it that is supposed to be fighting for pro-choice for women? Guess that’s only when they are killing helpless babies. They’re apparently not allowed to shoot at grown-up perverts that are threatening them.
Ball Point Pens Recommended in Defense Against Gunman?
Ball point pens to fight off gunman? This guy isn’t really serious, is he?
Comprehension Incomprehenable: What Part of Reality & Facts Don’t Folks Get?
It’s unbelievable! Comprehension incomprehenable. How many times do the facts have to be given and how many times do they have to be explained before folks get it? What part of reality and facts fly over their heads? One can only wonder and hope it isn’t catching.
Miss New York, Mallory Hagan (according to ABC news) was crowned Miss American 2013, but not before she spit out some astonishing thoughts that do represent too many of the people hanging out in the USA today.
“In the wake of the Newtown tragedy there has been a lot of talk about gun control,” Champion said, “One solution being proposed is an armed guard in every school. Do you think that would make our schools safer?”
Hagan responded, “I don’t think the proper way to fight violence is with violence.
The presence of an armed guard is not violence in action. It is a prevention. However, if someone rushed into a school ready to blow away the kids, would Ms. Hagan prefer that it is a specially trained officer or guard that intercedes or the unarmed school counselor who may have read textbooks by some utopian authors? Me? I’ll take the trained armed guard or police officer.
Hagan goes on to say:
I think the proper way is to educate people on guns and the ways we can use them properly. We can lock them up, we can have gun safety classes, we can have a longer waiting period.”
Wait! She wants to educate someone who is mentally ill on guns and ways to use them properly? Gun safety classes and longer waiting periods?
I will say this very, very slow.
Ms. Hagan, the shooter at the Sandy Hook school did NOT purchase the weapons he used. He took the weapons illegally for illegal purposes. Your theory of educating him on guns, gun safety classes and longer waiting periods does not apply in this tragic case. In short, your theory — no matter how pretty and delightful it sounds — is totally irrelevant to the facts at hand.
You, Ms. Hagan, and those such as you, keep talking about making new rules or bans that would mostly only apply to the law-abiding citizens anyway. Can’t you understand that the criminals and mentally ill people don’t give the slightest darn what the rules are, except maybe to find a way around them? Most of them are simply going to steal the guns or buy them illegally off the street. So, what part of that don’t you understand?
Reality oriented people keep trying to tell all you “let’s make some more rules for the law-abiding citizens to fight what the criminals and mentally ill are doing” people — that your reaction and solution does not make sense.
Stop and think.
Pervert teenage boy tries to touch a girl improperly in the school hallway. Girl slaps boy. Teacher is witness to the incident and is therefore required to go to sexual harassment in the work place classes.
Same thing. Makes as much sense.
Wrong people are being held accountable and the suggestion they should have classes, requirements and bans that aren’t even relevant to what transpired — is irrational thought and reaction!
The Sandy Hock tragedy had nothing to do with gun laws being too lax. The shooter didn’t acquire the weapon or weapons legally. He was a kid with mental problems. And that is what everybody keeps forgetting or passing over , as they strive to punish the legit gun owners, who had nothing to do with this horrible incident.
Bans and new gun ownership rules and regulations?
What part of the facts don’t some people get?
The Sandy Hook shooter wasn’t a legal gun owner, nor had he applied to be.
Gun Control: Liberals Rush to Use the Tragic Death of Little Children
How pathetic! Radical liberals are rushing to use the tragic death of little children to push through their gun control agendas? Are we really to be impressed?
Babies were wrongly killed in Newtown, but it had nothing to do with lax gun control laws. It had to do with a young man that had some serious mental problems. A young man that didn’t go buy any gun he used. He stole them.
So, the question becomes…
Why are the radical liberals going after the rights of “legal gun owners”, for what this young man wrongly did?
They didn’t kill those babies. Nor did any gun law assist the killer in killing.
So, why are they — the legal gun owners — being called to pay the price for a young man that did wrongly do this monstrous act? Why are their rights being called into question, when it wasn’t the law that was lax, but merely a young man in mental distress that did something horrendous and happened to use a gun to fulfill what he would have probably fulfilled one way or another anyways?
It’s time for common sense to step in and the radical liberals to be halted in their irrational tracks.
Legal gun owners did not harm the innocent babies in Newtown — it was an irrational young man with mental problems that targeted the little ones and gave the radical liberals a crisis to play upon! It’s time to take the crisis away from them and put it where it belongs — it’s time to blame the shooter and whatever made him do it!
Just WHO is in Charge Here: The People or Career Politicians
Something is mighty wrong! Just WHO is in charge? “We the People” or they — the “Career Politicians“?
We voted for the elected officials with the once upon a time belief they were going to be representing us. Instead, we keep finding out there are politicians 
that voted on ObamaCare without even knowing what was in the bill or how it might adversely affect “the people”. Did they even care? After all, they are allowed exclusion from what they are forcing upon us, so it’s no big deal, it appears.
Now, it seems there is possibly a secret discussion going on to push through gun control issues. “Secret”? Secret from us — the ones that are supposed to have our wishes represented? 
Secret from us — the people they are supposed to be listening to?
It’s always been questionable, but the “in your face” disregard for the opinion of the citizens, has gotten out of hand. It has become a statement by appearance & actions that once in office, some of these elected officials think their “ideology” is what is good for us little idiots that voted for them and they will decide for us, since our decider is defective and unenlightened. So, rather than represent us — they dictate to us and herd us to wherever they think we should be or to whatever they think should be done unto us.
I guess our “decider’s” are defective after all. We are the idiots that voted for these people with their little personal agendas. Maybe it’s time we tell them just who is in charge and that it is NOT THEM. Time to tell them their little games will no longer be tolerated. Next election, let’s vote for some trustworthy adults who understand they represent the people, not themselves and not whatever “cause” they “personally” support in spite of us!
Yes, next election, let’s take back our authority, vote for servants of the people and retire the career politicians who have forgotten who is supposed to be in charge. Yes, let’s retire them to the land of ObamaCare and the Gun Free Zones that they created and make sure they, too, get to share in their creations. Retire and unexempt them to the “real world” and “real results”. Maybe then they will see who the true idiots really are!
ACLU Declares ObamaCare to be Constitutional?
ACLU doesn’t appear to like people of religion much, especially if it be Christian in nature, so it’s not surprising they claim ObamaCare and its HHS mandate constitutional. This opinion though, is coming from a group that cried discrimination, or some such thing, involving (in the Kansas City area) an ordinance they helped write. Ooops! Change of mind? Time not to sue self? Big hope not many heard about this little boo boo?
I don’t know what came of the situation or how it got swept under the rug of “hush”, but it does prove a point. Just because the ACLU says something is or is not constitutional — does not make it so. It is merely their position and opinion. They, like everyone else, have to go to court and get a ruling. Well, unless they scare some little person or business with the threat of litigation that the later can’t afford. Then, they might win by “bulliness”, not because they actually had a fair and true case.
One thing I would like to hear the ACLU explain…
How is no co-pay for birth control not discrimination against those who have to pay a co-pay for life-saving meds?
If corporations can decide to be democrat or republican or a dem-pub and pick a candidate to donate money to, why can’t a corporation decide whether it wants to be secular or religious? And, if it wants to be religious, why can’t it pick what religion and decide not to contribute to something it totally doesn’t believe in? Like if it doesn’t believe in Obama, it shouldn’t have to donate to him, should it?
The ACLU is nothing more than a group of lawyers with opinions. It is not the say-so’er or decider on any given matter, beyond whether they believe there is a case and wish to handle it or not. They happen to think the HHS mandate is constitutional? Many think otherwise. The ACLU declaration isn’t the rule of law — it’s merely an opinion. Everyone has one — including them.
A Future World Remembered
Some believe the morning sun hides somewhere behind the iron walls of a future world many thought never to be, but none know for sure. It, too, perhaps was destroyed in those days of madness and banned from existence as so many things became outlawed and demonized for the profit of the few. The few who thought they had the answers to all things and blessed with the ability to lift their vile lives to the royalty of the gods.
The moments of the elite scorched the earth and danced in joy, as it watched the masses withered into a broken people struggling desperately to survive one moment to the next. And then it was over.
An army of the faithful fools, who had given the elite their death blow of wealth and power, rose up from the devastation they had blindly carried out and demanded their due. The elite laughed. Did any truly believe their deceitful word to be true and meant?
The laughter was swiftly silenced, as the army of revenge lashed out to crush the ruling ones. Some died in agony, while others fled to face a slow death of their own creation. For in those last moments, locked from their hoards of abundance, they, too, faced the man-made scarcity of necessities they had imposed upon their unwilling subjects. And, as their cries of utter torment reached into the moment of defeat, there was no mercy to embrace or to ease. It was for them what they had so excitedly bestowed upon those restricted from the celebrity of the self-proclaimed enlightenment.
There was no true delight, except by those whose hearts dined on the fruits of revenge, for as the last cry echoed against the walls of deceit and ignorance, the knowledge that only a few might survive was the only thing left abundant. Time was little. Hope was none. There was no sun shining to bid a new day. No sun to scare away the demons and the hopelessness of reality remembered. No sun to cast a shadow to hide the hideous knowledge sucking the life from all.
It could have been different. The madness could have been stopped. If only it had been, before it was too late.
Copyrighted 2012 & 2013 & 2014 Carrie K. Hutchens
All Rights Reserved
The Truth or Not From Senator Reid
Senator Reid had to get on television today, December 27, 2012, claiming we are headed for the fiscal cliff drop-off and, of course, it is all Rep. Boehner’s fault, when it isn’t simply all the Republicans’ fault. It couldn’t be a bit of liberal or Democrat fault in there, too, for they are the all enlightened and all-knowing, it would seem. And, this is not to mention that it is fine for the president to go on vacation in Hawaii and the Democrats to go home for Christmas, but how dare the Republicans do likewise. Them thar Republicans is bad folks fer doing what them Democrats done did, too. We all know how that works. The goose gets by with everything and the gander gets blamed for it in the world of politics and political posturing.
Reid told us that Mitt Romney didn’t pay taxes for years and demanded that he prove he did. He even used the Senate floor to do this campaign gesture to make Romney look like a tax evader. However, Romney did pay taxes and ole Reid got by with making false allegations. But now we are to believe him. We are to believe that what Reid is saying today is true, even if what he said during the campaign wasn’t. It must be true — it came out of his mouth — right? Wrong, because the deceitful and false comments came out of there as well.
The truth or not from Senator Reid — how can we ever know?
Reality: Guns Aren’t the Cause
The babies and other victims haven’t even left the morgue yet, and numerous liberals are screaming for more gun control as they bash the right and blame guns. Politics at its best. Never waste a crisis. Play on people’s emotions, rather than their reason. And, of course, what is more emotional than innocent children being slaughtered?
Guns are not the cause of these massacres. They have merely been the means. Take the guns away and those bent on mass murder, will simply utilize another means. What part of this can’t the rabid gun control supporters comprehend? The gun is not the “cause”, something else is and that is what we should be dealing with. That’s how one can attempt to stop the senseless slaughter of the innocent.
I remember a case where a mother desperately tried to get her son help. The system blocked her every attempt. There was always a reason this agency or that agency couldn’t help. Always a reason why she couldn’t get him admitted for evaluation. And then… what she feared… what she had been desperately fighting to prevent happened — he killed himself.
Though it is sad the young man killed himself, luckily he didn’t take others with him. But he could have. He could have wiped out a room full of people before ending his own life. What if he had? Would one then be blaming the weapon of his choice, or the fact that he needed help and the system blocked him obtaining it?
Rather than decide gun control laws based on the emotional reaction to this vicious slaughter of little ones and their protectors, it should be based upon reason. Details should be obtained and reviewed. The “cause”… the real thing that “caused” this young man to do one of the most hideous things imaginable, should be determined and studied, so as to prevent that “cause” from developing in others or make it identifiable so as to have chance to stop the person before he or she “acts out”.
Guns are not the “cause”. That’s a fact, no matter what the rabid gun control supporters try to argue. And, until people comprehend that fact and focus on what sets these people off and sends them into a killing frenzy — another frenzy is just waiting to happen. Next time though, it might be a bomb or a fire or knives. It could even be a car. One never knows, because these events are the result of the “cause”, not the weapon of choice.
What happened in Newtown, Connecticut is a hideous nightmare that no child, parent, family or community should have to live through. May no other community be faced with such devastation. God Bless the Children and the heroes, who fought to save them. Likewise, may God Bless and keep those left behind to remember the day Newtown lost its innocence!
Mayor Bloomberg Using Newtown to Push His Own Agenda?
It certainly didn’t take NYC Mayor Bloomberg long to jump on the horrific tragedy in Newtown, Conn. and start using it to push his own personal agenda. Way to go, Bloomberg. Don’t waste a crisis, right?
Yes, Bloomberg, play on the emotions of a country that is in shock from children — innocent children — being slaughtered. Never mind any of the details that have yet to be discovered or shared with those not directly involved in the case. Insinuate that you have all the answers and know best how to prevent such a nightmare from ever happening again. Go ahead, but many of us know differently. Many of us know that the system has often been the hindrance and big government, especially big brother, isn’t the way to make the world safer for anyone, including the children.
According to, “NYC Mayor Bloomberg slams Obama on guns: ‘We need immediate action’, by Beth Fouhy (The Ticket – 12/14/12):
Bloomberg, a longtime gun control advocate, released a statement through Mayors Against Illegal Guns, an advocacy group he co-founded with Boston Mayor Thomas Menino.
“President Obama rightly sent his heartfelt condolences to the families in Newtown. But the country needs him to send a bill to Congress to fix this problem,” Bloomberg said. “Calling for ‘meaningful action’ is not enough. We need immediate action. We have heard all the rhetoric before. What we have not seen is leadership—not from the White House and not from Congress.”
We haven’t seen leadership? This coming from someone that thinks he has the duty to ban 32 oz. drinks and to pressure women to breast feed? Bloomberg thinks it is leadership, to take advantage of the deaths of innocent children, though he is without all the facts involving this horrendous act of cowardice? Looks more like politics to me. Shame on you, Bloomberg.
Sexism: The Unforgivable Offense
Life is full of injustice, but all claims of injustice are not necessarily so. One of the claims that gets me steamed the quickest is for someone to scream “sexism” because someone dared to challenge a female type’s behavior, actions or words, or fail to give her a job that doesn’t even exist.
One of my favorite stories to tell is about the time I was in the back, when I heard a woman screaming in the front office. Of course, I went rushing up there to find out what was going on. There was this out-of-control woman screaming discrimination and threatening to sue. Okay.
The man she was screaming at, said something to the effect, “There she is.”
The woman gave me an ugly smug look and said she was not talking about a secretary.
He said, ” She is the owner.”
With that, the woman turned and huffed her little rear on out of the office.
I’ve never forgotten that moment.
The woman had come in and asked to apply for a job. All she was told was that there were no openings at the moment, but if she would leave, or drop off, her resume she would be considered when something did open up. She went ballistic claiming she was being discriminated against because she was a woman etc. etc. etc. He kept trying to tell her that wasn’t the case because… , but she was too busy yelling to listen.
I wouldn’t have hired that woman under any circumstances after the tantrum I witnessed.
As a female law enforcement officer, I never asked to be excused from responsibility for my actions because the big bad male officers were picking on little ole me. If I screwed up — “I” as a law enforcement officer screwed up. If I were held accountable, it was as a “law enforcement officer” and not a single thing to do with my gender. So, I don’t take too kindly to women trying to claim a right to a position, while then claiming special treatment rights that forbid accountability expectations, or they are the victims of discrimination and sexism.
Discrimination also includes the expectation of being held to a lesser standard than anyone else in the same position.
Sexism also includes the expectation of being held to a lesser standard than anyone else in the same position.
The unforgivable offense of sexism and discrimination is to claim it when none exists and thus makes the “claimer” guilty of the claim instead. It becomes an unfair ploy. There is no excuse!
Absurd: The Liberal Mentality
I’m never disappointed when it comes to the liberal mentality. It’s always absurd. I simply shouldn’t stay in the same room, when it starts rolling off the tongues or keyboards of the lost souls of absurdity fellowship.
Perhaps it is from being in law enforcement or because I like to be on the side of truth — I check out information, rather than spout propaganda and call it facts. Furthermore, I don’t throw allegations around as though they are snowflakes during a blizzard, though I often see that done by the absurd liberals. Defamation of character is a serious matter, even when carefully written in hopes of defining it as opinion. It is, at all times an injustice to the victim and the reader who happens upon it. There is no honorable excuse.
Obama was wrong about Romney’s position on the car manufactures taking bankruptcy. Though that was proven, Obama continued to say it as though it were the truth. Whereas he may have initially been misinformed, once informed — it became an outright lie.
Obama’s team knew darn good and well who Soptic was and all about his story. Cutter lied about it. Cutter got caught.
Obama and his operatives lied about Benghazi. Why? If waiting for an investigation to be completed, all one would have to say is there is no comment, until it is. So, instead, they make up some crazy stuff and blame a video? That doesn’t even make sense. So, what really was the reason for lying?
People died in Benghazi. Obama went to Vegas.
It truly bothers me when people do things and then accuse others of having done it instead. I do not associate with people such as this. Once any are identified as this type, I do not take their ramblings seriously ever again. After all, I do take offense at people telling others, as an example, that yellow is orange and that one is to accept that as fact or the person is some irrational type and called a bad name. The one demanding the incorrect acceptance should be called the name. The person should be called — mentally disturbed.
Reactions to, and opinion of, the facts can vary from one side to the other and all the space in between the two, but the facts are one thing that stay written in stone. No spin… no lie… ever changes the actual fact. Rewriting history doesn’t make the lie the truth. It is. It always will be what it is, no matter the efforts to make it otherwise. Truth is truth. A lie is a lie. Fact is fact.
Obama’s win came after a campaign of deceit and an intentional effort to pit people against each other. To have liberals, which does not include all Democrats, unable to take the wrongful win gracefully and with the ability to simply shut up, makes the win even more irritating. Worse, is when Romney is labeled as having done an Obama that he did not do.
Romney was not my pick, nor was Obama. However, if I were to pick between the two, it certainly wouldn’t have been the one that lied to my face or tried to rewrite history, while I was quite aware of the original and fact-filled version that actually was.
I guess the liberal absurdity portrayed in 1984 and Animal Farm weren’t simply fiction for pleasure. Looks as though it, and they, were a prophecy now trying to become reality.
A Lesson to Learn?
Is there a lesson to be learned that we have thus far failed to learn? Perhaps.
Tolerance is an interesting word and used in so very many different ways. It can be used to suggest one should not be so quick to judge. Be tolerant of the slow worker. Be tolerant of the blind who cannot hurry along such as we might like. Be tolerant of the slow learner. But I don’t think tolerance is considered a virtue when it comes to being tolerant of the perverts and perversions.
Some liberals, which are not what all Democrats are, seem to think anything non-traditional should be tolerated and welcomed. Little do they know what door they are walking into.
Some things that are presently being tolerated make the tolerators look like complete imbeciles. Some religions and cultures do not welcome nor tolerate outsiders. It’s their way or no way.
Some religions and cultures do not tolerate free sex for the women. Free sex brings with it a possible horrendous death penalty.
Some religions and cultures do not tolerate same sex marriage or same sex relationships or even being a same sex thinker. It, too, holds threat of death and unspeakable torture.
Yet, these proud tolerators in the Liberal arena somehow think those religions and cultures will be so grateful as to give them a free pass out of gratitude. No they won’t.
What fools these liberal tolerators are. Fools that won’t listen. Fools that know better than the rest of us. Fools that think they are so enlightened and above the rest.
One lesson these tolerators will quickly learn is that the higher they set themselves above the rest of the people (and falsely suppose what they have no right to suppose), the further they have to fall. The higher the cliff… the further the fall… and the harsher the smack. That’s physics 101 — math before Obama.
Republican Scare Tactics or Common Sense Inquiry?
I can’t believe some of the comments that come from the liberal mouths of madness. Their thoughts miss the dots and they are all over the place with claims they throw out, but don’t provide support for. Mostly, they claim the other side is guilty of what they themselves are doing or saying or thinking. It’s simply amazing. So, are there truly Republican scare tactics going on involving voter fraud or is common sense inquiry justified and what is actually transpiring?
According to Human Events, witnesses at an Ohio voting station were concerned because there were a great many non-English speaking Somalis arriving in groups to vote. Apparently, only those supporting the Democrat candidates and positions were advising and providing slate cards. I’d say that is a legitimate reason for concern. Were the Democrat supporters assisting the voters in how to vote the voter’s choice, telling them how to vote or even misleading them into voting contrary to their wishes?
It isn’t scare tactics by any, including the Republicans, to have concerns about non-English conversations at a voting station, especially if the potential voters seem to need directives on who to vote for — not just how to vote for their choice.
People who vote in our elections are required to be United State citizens. What part of that doesn’t the liberal mind comprehend? The concept of “required” because it doesn’t fit their immediate agenda and effort?
According to the liberal minds that I have been witness to, especially recently, the Republicans are required to abide by all rules, regulations and politically correct requirements as per whatever happens to be considered PC at any given moment, while the liberals are supposedly allowed to skip all that and do what feels good and gets them whatever they want whenever they want it. Rules don’t count when it is liberals involved, it would seem.
Liberals would be the first to scream, if it were Republicans or Conservatives speaking to voters in an unfamiliar language and offering directions on how to vote the non-democrat or non-liberal way. That’s a fact and they needn’t try to deny it.
Non-English should not be allowed at a voting station, unless both sides are available to make sure the person is both qualified to vote and that the conversation is a legit explanation of how to vote the person’s choice — not simply how they were directed to vote because they were easy prey.
Scare tactics? Sometimes it is common sense to ask questions and be concerned. Sometimes the concern is based on very real reason for concern. Sometimes people really are involved in breaking all the rules and need to be called on it. Sometimes it is actually common sense inquiry that really needs to be inquired about. Sometimes it really is!
It’s Crazy: It’s Politics
The insanity of politics is oozing out of the pours of so many that I don’t blame little Abby Evans for suffering frustration over Obama and Romney domination of the air waves.
We hear and read reports that we know are outright lies or at least distortions, yet we can’t do anything about it. Think CNN or MSNBC is going to let us rush onset and show them the truth and demand they report it? No, they certainly aren’t.
Perhaps more annoying is that the hosts seem to think it is just natural and fine for them to do commentaries promoting their side and expecting us to take it as NEWS — objective news. I think they think we are all too stupid and that it is okay to spoon feed us propaganda because they know best. You knew that, didn’t you?
Have we forgotten MSNBC thinking it was just fine for Al Sharpton to jump into the Trayvon Martin case and demonizing George Zimmerman before the investigation was even complete? Anyone else notice how Sharpton went a bit silent after it was discovered that Zimmerman is not a “white” Hispanic (whatever that is supposed to mean), but actually most likely less white than the president?
Politics. Politics and the screaming of discrimination that doesn’t exist to stir the people and get them to rally for whatever the cause. Like… like… Sandra Fluke. Oh, poor women who desperately need contraceptives or it shall be 1950 all over again. The madness. The distortions. The lies.
It boggles the mind.
With my own ears, I heard Obama basically call Romney a liar over his car bankruptcy opinion. However, it was readily proven that Romney was in fact telling the truth. Did that stop Obama from repeating something not true? Nope! He immediately went out on the campaign trail and kept saying it over and over and over again. Knowing what he was saying was not true means one thing — Obama was intentionally lying to try to gain vote.
Some will say that all politicians lie. That’s no excuse. They shouldn’t lie. They shouldn’t be allowed to lie. Maybe it is time to stop giving a free ride in politics and to the politicians who are supposed to be representing us with truth and integrity. It’s our choice.
We can make changes in the behavior of our news media and politicians. All we have to do is refuse to accept the inappropriate behavior and demand truth in reporting, campaigning and representation. If they don’t honor our demands, the media loses viewers (therefore advertisers) and the politicians don’t win the elections. It’s actually quite simple. We just need to make the choice.
Until we demand better, it will go on as is. It will be crazy. It will be politics as usual.
Abby Evans is demanding better. I’m with her.
The Allegations of Racism
Earlier, I read a column suggesting that Republicans are racist. I became quite annoyed. Okay, I became far more than annoyed at the careless allegations being so freely and wrongly thrown around for what appeared to be a self-serving motive to promote Democrats and demonize Republicans.
I have known a great many Democrats and Republicans in my life. Never do I knowingly associate with racists no matter what skin shade they might happen to be, because I don’t like racists. Never have and never will. And, contrary to the opinion of the author of the piece that annoyed me so, the majority of racists I have ever known have been Democrats, not Republicans. That’s right! Democrats.
The difference between that author and me is that I don’t assume all Democrats are made out of a single mold, nor do I think Republicans are either. Libs on the other hand, I’m not so sure about. Their craziness seems to come from a singular mindset and no one knows what they are going to come up with next.
Back to racism though.
The Democrats are the ones that started up the KKK and encouraged what was to become Planned Parenthood, not for the good of women, but to get rid of as many of the unacceptables as they could. The KKK didn’t like Blacks or Catholics or Jews or anyone who supported any who were. So, just how can people now claim the Democrats are not racists and trying to protect the Blacks from the mean ole Republicans? You know, the Republicans that fought for Civil Rights and such as the Democrats fought against it.
Some true history needs to be read, rather than simply reading these outlandish claims that are anything but representative of the truth.
Authors such as the one I am referring to, can propaganda it all they want, but it’s not our obligation to believe these horrendous fables simply because they do. It is our obligation to seek out the truth and be willing to accept it once it is found.
Just like it is a lie that Republicans are trying to take away women’s contraceptives, it is a lie that they, as a group, are racists.
Public Relations is meant to sway people to think and act in a particular way. Propaganda is PR on steroids, with no concern about truth in advertising. It is meant, or most often used, to promote a known lie and to obtain a goal by whatever means is necessary.
False accusations of racism against the Republicans (as a whole) are just that. It is propaganda. It’s a known lie. That is something that should matter to us all. It’s time to say, “No more! No more lies!”
The Desperation of the Obama Libs
You have to be kidding. The Obama libs are at play again with their spins and distortions and righteous indignation. Have they no honor? Is it really their motto that all is fair in love, war and politics? It would seem to be from all that has been transpiring.
Richard Mourdock a Republican Senate candidate from Indiana is not allowed to say that he is Pro-Life and believes life is precious or he is painted as a warrior against women? Oh, but one can say it is fine and dandy to leave a living baby alone to die, if the mother intended an abortion and we are to all jump up and down in support of such cruelty? Watch me not give praise or a jump of joy.
I listened to what Mourdock said and he did not say that he or God intended or supported rape in the slightest. He wasn’t supporting the vicious act — he was merely saying that he feels life is precious and a gift from God even in such horrid situations. Guess what!… many people actually feel life is precious as well. Got a spin for that?
The Obama campaign is so desperate that it is looking for any word or phrase to spin? It sure seems as though that is the case. I’m not impressed. I see the Obama campaign as pathetic, rude and childish. If I had ever considered voting for the Obama — that has all changed now. I would never vote for anyone that feels it is okay to take other people’s comments out of context and obviously distort what was intended. People like that can’t be trusted.
Tell us again what Obama’s stance in on late term abortion and leaving babies to die? I’d say Obama & Playmates have an ongoing “War on Innocent Life”, whether it be babies, elderly or you and me — the once unsuspecting!