I thought about writing about today’s events…

October 15, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

I thought about writing about today’s political events, but quickly realized it would be redundant. Anyone following the happenings of this current life-mess read it all yesterday or perhaps even several weeks ago. Oh… yes… there are a few technicalities that might have changed, but the outcome is right back where it started.

Radical liberals are still calling other people names, while whining if they think they’ve been called one.

We have the radical liberals deciding the Confederate flag is a statement of the Tea Party, Republicans & Senator Ted Cruz attitude, but the OFA thinks it is unfair to suggest they are less than sensitive to the disabled after having a sign that says, “Tea-Tards”. (Like we don’t get the reference to the term – retards.)

Oh, and then there are those radical liberal writers that suggest Tea Party members have all these characteristics that are quite unproven? Does truth matter at all to the radical liberal?

But it’s all a mess.

One moment it looks like progress is being made.

Never mind.

Then there is ole Harry Reid… you know… the senator that wrongly threw out a rumor during the election year and hoped it would stick? Harry Reid is blocking any effort the House makes to try to provide funding, yet then tries to blame the Republicans for the failure to fund?

Oh how delicious is that?

The constant is Obama with his rhetoric and wrongful descriptions as he always blames someone — anyone — except Obama!

On and on we go… where we stop… no one knows! But stop we should! Stop we must! It’s time to bring sanity back into government and into our lives. After all, we really aren’t their little zombies, unless we allow ourselves to be.

Time to pay attention!

Time to use our own minds! — the ones not cluttered with irrational thoughts!

As for writing about today’s events — never mind — tomorrow is soon enough!

The White House & Congress: The Home of Court Jesters

October 15, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Have the White House and radical liberals of congress begun to believe their own propaganda media? They certainly don’t seem to have the slightest clue what the ACTUALLY INFORMED PUBLIC is thinking and how they are responding to this childish and unnecessary behavior. Maybe someone should tell them that the public, beyond their cult, isn’t sympathetic to their message?

The attack on Veterans has outraged Americans — not endeared the president and his followers to the People!

Perhaps the president doesn’t care. He is after all “The One They All Have Been Waiting For”, is he not?

Whatever is going through the minds of this administration and radical liberals of congress, the People are paying attention and the lapdog media reps are NOT portraying the reaction as it truly is. This administration and the radical liberals may have some people on their side at this point, but I’m betting many more will desert once they get a good look at their insurance options. Then… they, too, will have a chance to feel they were deceived and mocked just like those they use to mock.

The White House and Congress seem to have become the home of the court jesters, who spend their time fooling the public into thinking they truly care. And, dare a representative or a senator actually be concerned and want to work for the People — he or she or they can be assured to be labeled something not pleasant. Perhaps even to be called one of the “Tea-Tards”, which we all know is likening Tea Party members to retards. (You know — that politically incorrect term none of us are supposed to use anymore? Well, unless we are radical liberals.)

Yes, the White House & Congress have become the home of Court Jesters! “Jest” how unfunny is that?

Tricked & Manipulated: All the Sheep in a Line to be Sheared

October 12, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

I truly hate it when people attempt to trick or manipulate me. I don’t do it to them and I would appreciate the same courtesy in return. Of course, in this particular time period of the world, it seems the trickery and manipulative behavior is a bit overwhelming and behind almost every bush and peanut tree.

One might laugh and say something about me watching commercials, as I use to frequently do when they were entertaining. Don’t I realize they are an advertising firm’s attempt to manipulate my opinion and make me decide I absolutely need the product in question, whether I truly do or not? Yep! Yep! I realize that to be completely so. However, that’s the difference — I know what commercials are all about. But the government and its agents? Well, that’s a different story all together. We shouldn’t have to be worried about being swayed by the better ad or public relations scheme. Government should be straight forward and fact-filled — not an entertaining ploy .

Should be!… not that it is. Now we have the White House employing entertainers to sell Obamacare? (Does this mean, since these are ads, that we can file false advertisement complaints?)

The government shouldn’t be involved in having a Truth Squad, or whatever it is called, to harass and stalk people who are voicing their opinion. And, I must admit… now that I’m on the subject… I’m more than a bit tired of Orwellian enforcers and blind followers calling me the idiot.

(I’m tired of them calling you an idiot, too.)

The United States of American may not have been perfect, but it wasn’t this mad, selfish, self-centered, immediate gratification demanding and threatening madness we have now. How we got from 2007 to now is a whirl wind of bizarre. This mess created by the radicals and activists is unbelievable and unsustainable. It will eventually bite them in their backyards and it will no longer be their heavenly dream come true.

The problem is…

How do we, as a nation, survive, until “reality” wakes up the coma prone and rabid New World followers? Can we? I believe so.

We are a creative and hardworking people, who have merely been put on hold. Once the common sense ban is lifted and the business & job-killing mercenaries are retired, we can fire up our efforts and rebuild and rebuild some more. In the meantime, we need to help individuals, who might not be able to survive this mess entirely on their own. We’re going to need them too. And, let’s not forget the elderly, disabled and children — all have a part to play in making our country great again.

The moral of the story is…

Don’t fall for the trickery and manipulative rhetoric being spewed by those who want absolute control of every aspect of our lives. Don’t be fooled. These people aren’t looking out for us — they are out for control and profit. After all, they certainly aren’t trying to redistribute their money and assets, or give up their lifestyles, now are they?

Don’t be fooled. Realize what we are seeing right now is one big commercial, as the government and agents try to trick and manipulate us into believing they know what is best for us and we should simply agree to be nice, quiet little sheep!

Baaaaaa Baaaaaa, not I. I shan’t be nice or quiet or simply follow because I’m told I must. What about you? Has the trickery and manipulation become apparent to you, too?

Guardianship: Time for Accountability

October 10, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Guardianship abuse seems to be one of the most profitable scams of the day! Are you safe from it? Not necessarily.

Professional guardians, and professionals who become guardians, in some states, can isolate the ward (even from family and friends), bill outrageous amounts, sell houses and other property, take over bank accounts and make the ward’s life absolutely miserable as they do. Don’t believe it? Neither did many others, until it happened to them.

The public is led to believe they have the right to pick the person they wish to make decisions for them, should they become unable to do so or need some help. However, in Florida, it appears, judges are allowed to ignore the person’s wishes and place him or her under the care of a professional guardian. Once that appointment has been made, the family can be completely excluded from the ward’s life. Worse, if there can be a worse, the ward is completely at the mercy of the guardian for better or for worse.

A guardian should be someone who is looking out for the best interest of the ward — not the ward being a money-making product to be billed to pennilessness.

When a guardian has already been chosen by the person, the courts should not be allowed to ignore that wish and appoint a professional guardian, unless there are some serious extenuating circumstances.

In my opinion, one of the first signs something is terribly wrong with a guardian situation is when the ward is isolated from family and friends. This action alone suggests there is something to hide. If not, then why would a guardian worry about the ward associating with all the people that had meant so much to him or her?

People who don’t understand the harm isolation can do, should spend a couple of months alone in a room with no stimulation and the only human contact (and brief words exchanged) being when someone brings a meal and picks up the tray. That experiment will give you a taste of what many under guardianship go through and what you may one day be looking forward to, if the laws are not changed.

The courts should not have the right to over-ride a person’s wishes, without true cause to do so. This is a person’s life after all. And family members and friends should be considered for guardianship prior to any professional being thought of.

Professional guardians should be held to the strictest of standards and there should be no immunity for them not also given to a family member or friend acting in the same capacity.

Guardians should not be allowed to create bills and then sell off the ward’s home and possessions to make payment, as easily as it seems it can be done in many jurisdictions.

Wards should not lose the right to fight for their freedom from guardianship, especially if it is a wrongful one. As it is, if the guardian has all the say — the ward can be silenced and kept from fighting against an abuse guardianship situation. How is that right? Doesn’t that defeat the very purpose of guardianship?

Guardianship may have been created to help those who had no one to help them, but it has evolved into a money-making adventure too often gone wrong. It’s time for review. It’s time to fix the loop-holes and laws that allow the wards to become nothing more than pawns and products to use up, drain and throw away. It’s time to limit judicial and guardianship control and to hold the system accountable!

Death Panels: To Be Deemed the Most Non-Existent Reality of 2010?

October 9, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Over and over and over again, we hear how fear mongers and wing-nuts are falsely claiming there are “death panels” where death panels do not exist. Keith Olbermann goes so far as to claim that rather than death panels, there are “life panels.” He just doesn’t seem to get it that not everyone’s experience is like the one he had with his father’s passing, where his father’s wishes were upheld. Olbermann just doesn’t seem to get it that some people, instead, get to find out just how real the “death panel” concept is and has been for some time now.

I’m sorry for Olbermann’s loss on the one hand, but quite offended on the other. How dare he suggest his situation is proof there are no death panels and we are all just paranoid, if we say they do exist? (My interpretation of the Politico article, “Olbermann’s father dies” .) Not everyone is privileged to have a son in such a vocal position, or to have everything work out as the person and family wishes it to. There are actually some who find the so-called non-existent “death panels” stepping right into the middle of a fight for life situation and deeming it is time for them or their loved one to be dead.

Let’s talk Andrea Clark down there in Texas a few years ago.

The so-called ethic’s committee decided she was a futile care case and it was time to put her down. Didn’t seem to matter that wasn’t her wish or her family’s wish or that she was fully aware of what was transpiring.

This was the action of a “life panel”?

What about Ted Stith, Sr., from New York?

Ted goes on vacation down there in Florida, has a stroke and, immediately after he does, it is suggested that he be starved and dehydrated to death? Didn’t seem to matter that a friend is reported to have said he was aware, was reaching for water and was trying to communicate. On second thought, I guess it did matter. According to reports, she was banned from his room and the possibility of giving him food or water, even if it was his rightful request to be made, and so he was denied the mere necessities for survival.

This is what Olbermann considers the “life panel” process?

We also have Terri Schiavo, who was put to death by court order. A case where she, a brained damaged but otherwise healthy individual, was starved and dehydrated to death based upon heavily conflicted testimony. Perhaps the conflict itself should have been taken more seriously, as would have been, if the people fighting for her life had been considered of importance to the right audience.

Olbermann considers starving and dehydrating a healthy person to death to be what “life panels” do?

More recent in the news is the Gary Harvey case.

The so-called ethics committee decided Gary Harvey should be starved and dehydrated to death as well and put it before the court. He was, after all, at death’s door, wasn’t he? The order to put Gary Harvey to death was suddenly pulled after the media picked up on the story. Gary Harvey, who was supposedly at death’s door and needing to be starved and dehydrated to death last summer, is still alive. Looks like someone got something wrong about Gary being unable to survive and ready to die, and needing to be put down, especially by such a hideous method as starving and dehydrating him to death.

The fight for Gary’s life, by his wife, while a system suggests it’s time to kill him off, is Olbermann’s opinion of a “life panel” in motion?

Just how would Olbermann have felt, if he went up against a committee that decided they knew better and was going to disregard his father’s wishes?

Just how would Olbermann have felt, if his dad could have been saved, but the “system” decided otherwise?

No doubt, it would have been quite different if Olbermann was fighting for his father’s life, per his father’s wishes, and he came up against a system that does have so-called ethics committees (death panels), or the court system that makes mistakes and doesn’t necessarily listen to the truth and rule accordingly, or an insurance company that was refusing to pay for rightful care, or even a nurse that didn’t see the fight still in his dad.

Bet it would be different then!

Maybe Keith Olbermann ought to get out of the studio and talk with the people who have lost family members to his wondrous “life panel” concept that is actually what is becoming the non-existent reality of the 21st century.

Whether it be by denial of coverage, denial of care or courts deciding to kill people off, because of conflicted testimony…

Death panels do exist — and under the NewWorldCare proposal, they will become far more common!

_______________________

Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.

_________________________

Originally published: Death Panels: To Be Deemed the Most Non-Existent Reality of 2010? By Carrie K. Hutchens on March 17th, 2010 – Dakota Voice

People have lost their minds…

October 4, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Exactly when has the NRA ever promoted gun violence? (I’m asking for proven incidents, not something made up in the minds of people, who want to get rid of all guns, except those used to protect them.) Never!

It seems that some people have this intense need to get rid of guns, because guns have been “used” by “some” people to kill or harm. Though knives have also been “used” by “some” to kill and harm, I haven’t seen the wild and crazy anti-gun fanatics attempt to get rid of their set of pocket or kitchens knives. They definitely don’t speak ill of the info-commercial hosts and accuse them of promoting violence — yet… yet… look at all the people who die via being stabbed to death.

Interesting would be to see (in these “over-reacting schools & other public spaces”)…

If a person walked in with a NRA shirt promoting “hunting” (the obtaining of food) and another person walked in with a T-shirt promoting kitchens knives (companies) for preparing food obtained — who would be the most likely to get called out for a so-called and unacceptable “violent message”? I don’t think we have to suppose too much.

Too many people seem to have lost their common sense gene and minds!

“People” are responsible for their actions, not the “object” they utilize to carry that act out. And just because there are people who happen to use guns for their acts of violence, doesn’t mean that the NRA (law-abiding citizens) had a single thing to do with it or has ever once promoted or condoned such behavior by anyone.

To blame the NRA for misuse of weapons by people, who aren’t even members, means that anyone selling or using kitchen knives are likewise responsible for any and all use of kitchen knives and they too should be held accountable for wrongful use of them.

People have indeed lost their common sense and their minds! It’s proven every day!

How dare you own a knife! Are you promoting violence? After all, it is someone’s weapon of choice.

Oh, how deliciously ironic…

October 3, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

“Obama tells congressional leaders he won’t negotiate on shutdown, debt“???… oh, how deliciously ironic. If Obama won’t negotiate on any of those things — or anything — what is he willing to negotiate on?

Things have gotten out of hand. (Actually, they got out of hand long ago.) There was no reason that the Democrats and the President of the United States of America could then (or now) truthfully feel their plan for health care reform was so perfect — so very perfect — so very, very perfect — because they are “all-knowing” — that a little devil’s-advocacy and balance wasn’t in order, rather than a defiant blow-off of everything and anything not-their-way.

No reason, but it happened.

Now we have tons of people losing their jobs, or at least their full-time hours, and definitely their certainty of what tomorrow brings. No longer does the need of the worker matter — the only things that matter are the whims of Obamacare and the dear Democrats & Pals that claim to so care for the people’s well-being.

And, rather than try to explain what they were thinking and why they thought (and continue to think) they were right and meant/mean well — they start in with the name-calling (calm rhetoric) and low blows towards any who do not agree with them, not to mention those special terms …

In recent weeks, however, Obama and his aides and Democratic allies have accused the Republican legislators of being anarchists, suicide-bombers, hostage-takers, arsonists, political terrorists, fanatics, blackmailers, and ideological crusaders.

“What we’re not for is negotiating with people with a bomb strapped to their chest,” Dan Pfeiffer, Obama’s top media adviser, said in a CNN interview this week. ~Obama: I use ‘calm’ rhetoric, unlike ‘hostage takers’ (The Daily Caller — 7:16 PM 10/02/2013)

The irony of the Obama Administration — their willingness to call names (calm rhetoric), refuse to budge and then dare to project their words and behavior on others. So, are we to be impressed and feel more secure in Obamacare and this administration now that we know they are pretty darn good at retaliating, hitting below the belt and name-calling (calm rhetoric)? Sure makes me want to rush out and buy me an Obamacare plan — how about you?

Victims of Government Shutdown vs Victims of Obamacare

October 2, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

There are numerous stories about the employees being affected by the government shutdown and we are only two days into their financial nightmare. Understand that I’m not wishing for, or happy about, anyone losing their income, but wait a minute… the shutdown is only temporary — Obamacare financial losses are long term, if not permanent. Why aren’t those Obamacare affected employees/former employees as important as the government ones?

Listening to everyone carry on about how unfair this all is, the thought “entitlement” keeps coming to mind. It’s as though the government employees are entitled to their jobs, though no one else is entitled to theirs. It’s as though everyone else is considered expendable and simply collateral damage.

I get it.

The news media is headed towards government run organizations.

Government employees are protected, while private sector is destroyed.

Then we come to the government being in complete control of every aspect of our lives and deaths.

Orwellian fiction is fast becoming our 21st Century reality. And so few seem to notice what is happening around them or realize how they themselves are being led to what to believe and not believe. As for now, it is a tragedy that the government employees have lost two days of pay, while a shoulder shrug that so many private sector workers have lost their jobs or the hours they were counting on. Where is the outrage for their long term lack of pay? Where is the fight to get the job killers talking and fighting to get the private sector workers back on the job? Oh, that’s right… the job killers are the ones fighting to keep Obamacare intact regardless of what devastation and destruction it causes.

Government workers = entitled to job and pay.

Private sector workers = expendable and entitled to nothing.

This should be all it takes to open the eyes of the willing-blind. Do you now see by the actual “Victims of Government Shutdown vs Victims of Obamacare” where we have come to be and where we are headed? We should all be more than a bit concerned. Is Obamacare, as is, really worth it?

Games on the Hill: The DC Crowd at Play

September 30, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

The DC Crowd is on the field prancing around, flexing their muscles and making sure their ear-muffs are firmly in place. Watch out — there it goes — first insult slammed into right field. Cruz runs wide… back… back… there he goes… he jumps… and it’s a leaping catch right into his corner.

Reid calls it an incomplete and declares no points for Cruz.

Next ball down the center… oh… whoa… look at it go! Lee jumps up catches it… passes it down the court to Cruz… Cruz does a jump shot… in it goes… a basket in one! The crowd goes wild!

Reid calls out, “I told you I wasn’t going to let you make that play, so it doesn’t count.”

Volley over the net and no one on the other side to send the ball back. Instead, they are sitting on the sidelines waiting for the touch down they think they have no hope of stopping.

Reid calls out again, “Time for a break.”

Confused yet at exactly what game the DC Crowd is playing and what the rules actually are? Most people are. The rules keep changing depending on the team up-to-bat in would seem. After all, it appears to be an unquestionable line-drive right down the winning lane and someone in power calls it a “foul ball” and readily dismisses it. Umpire goes with the power-person and everyone else is standing around going, “Huh? How did that happen?”

Instant and long term replay doesn’t seem to have much influence over what was versus what is said to have been. (Kinda Orwellian history in the making.) So, while the DC Crowd is at play, playing whatever it is they are playing, it’s the other crowd that is being turned away from the stadium gates and left in limbo to pay the price for however these games turn out.

I wonder how much those ear muffs have cost “We the People” thus far?

Pulling the Plug

September 30, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

It is mind blogging how some people are so ready to suggest the plug should be pulled on others. What if the pluggee doesn’t want the plug pulled? Pull it anyway?

There you go. One more down. Who else can we get rid of?

The thought brings to mind a picture of an eager face with a vile grin and some drool running down the chin for good measure. “Oh look, that little old lady in Aisle 4 doesn’t have quality of life. I wouldn’t want to live that way, walking with a limp. Let’s get her. Boy, this legal murder is empowering. Look at me! I have power over life and death. Why didn’t we start doing this before now? Oh, good another one back by the frozen foods. Such a good day for plug pulling.”

Think it can’t ever happen?

Who would have thought we would ever be where we are today? Who would have thought we would be so ready to say that helpless people “aren’t in there”, and thus believe it is simply okay to starve and dehydrate them to death? Who would have thought, but that is where society has arrived at. Society is killing off the weakest without thought to those who have fallen victim to illness, injury, disability or age. It is outrageous at how cold and cruel our society has become.

It is easy to say someone has no hope, when no therapy or attempt has been made to help the person get better. It’s causing the problem and then having the problem be our supportive argument as to why not to take any positive actions.

For those who might not get what I just said, it would be like a husband taking the one and only family car and then blaming the wife for not driving to the grocery store for something he wanted while he was gone with the one and only car that prevented her from being able to drive to the store to get what he wanted while he was gone with the one and only car.

Or, how about a teacher not giving an assignment, but then blaming the class for not completing the assignment not given?

Likewise, people can’t always get better without the tools and treatment being made available to them.

They can’t wheel themselves down the hallway, if they don’t have a wheel chair to wheel.

They can’t do physical therapy if none is offered, nor anyone to tell them how.

They can’t take the necessary medications to cure their illness, if no medication is made available.

They can’t eat or drink if no food or water is provided.

They can’t look out the window if there is no window to look out of.

Simply put, people can’t get better if they aren’t allowed to get better, because all things that will (or might) make them better is denied them.

But none of this appears to matter in this day and age, when the so-called “Enlightened” seem to feel they are the anointed and have the power of a god to make life and death decisions in spite of what the person or family might want.

Listening to the arguments of many is a waste of time. They justify with issues that are irrelevant to the case at hand. I liken their arguments to:

Spot — the dog — pooped in the yard, so Spot’s owners aren’t going to feed the cat bird food.

So, one asks this person what any of that has to do with anything or even with each other, and the person might come back with the righteous question — “What? Are you trying to say that Spot didn’t poop in the yard?”

Or, maybe the response will be, “What? Are you supporting feeding the cat bird food?”

Sometimes I wonder if the irrational is to drive the rational over the edge or wear them down where they give up the fight against this madness. I don’t know, but I do know that I get tired of it and would like to put the irrational in a padded room with all their irrational statements played back to them throughout the day and night and see their reaction to their own words… their own arguments… their own enjoyment at playing these games with others.

I guess I should ask for forgiveness for wishing such on even them, but it doesn’t take away the truth that something really does need to be done to shake up this world and get it (and us) back on track. This craziness has simply gotten all too boring and quite too dangerous for all too many people.

Those who think they are gods and anointed to make choices between life and death for those who aren’t asking for their services, should be demoted to Spot’s poop scoopers and making sure the cat isn’t fed the bird food, while those who respect life — should be the ones moved into the position considered “Enlighten” and given the courtesy of a listen.

Once “non-responsive” is not necessarily forever “unresponsive”.

Unable to speak or move is not necessarily a sign that a person is gone and that the brain is dead.

Those who believe the garbage being spit out in this day and age to suggest otherwise of what I just said, should read the story of Kate Allatt, Mother-of-three left ‘locked in’ by a stroke last year WALKS down the aisle to renew her wedding vows . By Daily Mail Reporter Created 10:15 AM on 25th May 2011. It might just be an eye opener and give a person wonder of what if they were in a situation as she. Would they, too, like the opportunity to return to their life? Or, would they rather Spot eat the bird food and the cat poop in the yard while the bird makes the decision just before he goes to work to consider giving the rat still another loan to pay for his teeth so he can chew up the constitution and any good works that might have once shown us to be compassionate human beings trying to make this world a better place for all?

Pulling the plug on any, should be a something taken very serious and it has nothing to do with what Spot did in the yard today or yesterday or any day before!

It has to do with the issues at hand!

It has to do with a human life we are talking about and deciding about!

What if we are wrong?

Ask Kate Allatt and her family about the consequences of wrong and what might have been if continued!

Ask her if she rather have been unplugged or allowed to walk down the aisle to renew her wedding vows. Her answer might astonish our “enlightened”, but it certainly doesn’t astonish me or the rest of us “unenlightened”.

We know.

We just hope the realization spreads.

**~*~**

Pulling the Plug originally published on Dakota Voice – August 26th, 2011

Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.

Divide & Conquer: A Statement We Desperately Need to Remember

September 28, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Divide and conquer is what an organized enemy does before going in for the win. It’s perhaps time that “we” take note of what has been happening in our world. We have been divided and we are being defeated at every turn. “We” meaning all of us that are not on the elite pedestal of exemption. “We”, the ones who will be first to feel the results of this run-away train of arrogance, ignorance and lack of empathy for all but their special and chosen groups of whom — “we” are not a member, nor ever shall be.

People are stepping forward and letting it be known that they do not want ObamaCare as it now exists. The voices are not only ignored, but to listen to the MSM, and speeches from Obama down to his lowest communication agent — the citizens are instead quite elated. It’s those bad Republicans that are trying to do mean and dirty things. Just who is it that is not living in reality? Perhaps they hope we will believe it is us, rather than they. And truthfully… if they are able to isolate us — so we can’t or won’t compare notes — they have a very real chance of creating their illusion and presenting it as authentic. That should give one a shiver or two.

Racism does still exist today, just as sexism does. However, it isn’t as it once was. It isn’t the dominate trend — it is the exception. However, there are those who stoke the fires and attempt to make everything about racism or sexism or whatever other “ism” necessary, so as to create an illusion of victimhood that can be utilized to herd the targeted person or group towards whatever belief and action is beneficial to the agitators goal.

Sadly, too many fall for the scam and eagerly follow to whatever hate and discontent they were assigned to be a part of. Yes, assigned to.

Can any actually believe this chaos simply happened on it’s own?

We must remember that the enemy strives to divide so they might easily conquer.

Our world, as it now is, is being driven and directed for the benefit of someone, or someones, who definitely are not looking out for the best interest of “We the People”. Whoever these specific people are — they have proven to be masters of deception, division and defection. Their mastery is our threat — our realization is theirs.

Divide & Conquer — A Statement We Desperately Need to Remember!

Stop Trying to Deal Me Into Your Card Game

September 26, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

All these racism and discriminations claims have gotten a bit old and I truly wish people would stop trying to deal me in. I don’t want to play and I’m not gonna play. Can I make it any clearer than that?

The other day I referred to “rude & lewd in public”. It was immediately assumed I was referring to homosexuals. Does this mean that deep-down, the accuser feels the homosexuals’ behavior is (or is often) “rude & lewd” or did the person immediately have a memory flash of seriously “rude & lewd in public” by some from the homosexual activists of the world? Either way, I don’t care what was behind the accusation — the accuser was way off base.

When I say “rude & lewd in public”, I am specifically referring to people — anyone — who acts “rude & lewd in public”. If I am referring specifically to homosexuals ONLY acting “rude & lewd in public”, I will be very clear about who I am referring to. There won’t be any need to assume or guess or make false accusations. I will say it outright, plain and clear, because I have nothing to hide about my reactions. They are reasonable. Yes, I said — reasonable.

In other words: I do not like nor appreciate being exposed to “rude & lewd”. There are no exceptions. “Rude & lewd” is “rude & lewd”, no matter who the participants are. It’s that simple.

I do not base my likes and dislikes upon the color of a person’s skin or their sexual orientation. I base it upon the person’s attitude and behavior. My life proves this to be so. No Harry Reid or Al Sharpton types can change the truth — they can only change the perception in the minds of people who often don’t think for themselves or are to quick to react to the emotional game so often played upon them.

In the past, I have tried to rationally respond to false allegations, but those days are numbered, if not absolutely done with.

You want to call me a racist — you prove it! I have no obligation to prove your lie to be a lie.

You want to say that I have somehow discriminated against anyone — you better get some creative writers on your team. You might even need a teleprompter or two. Yes, and you might even need some Botox remover to get rid of the “give-away” smile — you sly one, you.

Life can be a wondrous thing.

People can be happy.

Neighbors can enjoy each other.

Family, friends & neighbors can readily be there for one another.

All these things can be, unless we allow “self-serving” activists to continue to divide us with their distortions and lies and expensive public relations campaigns and/or media opportunities.

To falsely accuse people of discrimination is no different than being discriminated against. It is one and the same — just done differently. Both are wrong.

People need to take a step back and really take a good look at this world and what is happening in it. They need to think about the cards dealt to them and do some weighing in on who is truly responsible for things that have happened and are happening that just aren’t right.

I guess the short of my story is…

Maybe more people ought to take notice of the stacked deck and decide that they don’t want to be dealt into the irrational game thrown at us.

Maybe more people ought to take note and decide not to play into the hands of the activists and wanna-bee dictators that seem to love to toy with us all and try to isolate us from one another.

Maybe… just maybe… we ought to throw in the hand they dealt us and start with a fresh deck — one that isn’t tainted and slanted and stacked against us — US — We the People!

There Was a Time

September 25, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

There was a time when courtesy was expected and the rude people were looked at rudely.

A time when sexual matters were kept private (by most) and definitely not shouted from the roof-top or announced on public television for all to hear.

A time when we weren’t hearing commercials involving Pleasureville and blowing someone’s hair back.

A time when women didn’t flaunt their nursing boobs (uncovered) in public to the discomfort of others trying to dine.

A time when manners meant something.

Strangely, it wasn’t really that long ago. What happened to that world? I miss it.

I’m in a really bad mood…

September 24, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Yesterday, I was quite ticked off because I truly don’t like people writing to me and suggesting that those who are somewhat like-minded with me are something I know for a fact they are not! Oh, that really ticks me off. Not that you would ever guess.

But… it didn’t begin there… nor does it end there.

Not long ago, I was suspended from a site. I received one thing that said I needed to agree not to do something anymore. Problem was… I hadn’t done it in the first place. And, for various reasons, I wasn’t about to confess to something I did not do. Like… if I had taken the easy way out just to get back on the site — it would have been on record that I said I wouldn’t do it anymore? Duh, the false confession could later be used against me with someone saying I had admitted to doing it prior, regardless of the fact I really hadn’t ever done the deed (in question) ever.

Let’s put it this way…

I would rather never be on that site again, than to say I did something I did not do!

Needless to say, I don’t believe in false confessions. Oh, did I say that already?

Nevertheless, I wrote to the site in question and they did let me back on, but it sounded as though they still thought I did whatever because their system supposedly said whatever it was it said. On the other hand, I wondered if they had gone and taken a “physical” look, which would have shown what I was saying was true. Maybe they even found out there is a flaw that the bad people figured out and used to their advantage to get rid of the opposition? (The latter being what I think actually happened – the radicals and silencers found the flaw & were using it to their advantage.)

Then we come to today. I started out the day finding I’m suspended from still another place. (I wish I could say who. Maybe later, I will.) Once again, I am at the mercy of a group that can’t (or won’t) tell me specifics, but can hold me accountable for what I have no ability to control, even if it did happen. But what if it didn’t… or what if it was a setup because I had ticked someone off? After all, I do write and I do tick off radical liberals quite often, don’t I?

Might they set me up for punishment?

Naw! They wouldn’t do something like that, would they?

Oh, that ticks me off…

September 23, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

I just love it when people send P.R. (propaganda) mail and call me names or otherwise insult me in their little pep talk aimed at getting money from me , no less. I guess I’m supposed to be one of their Zombie followers or too stupid to get that I’ve been insulted or that insulting me will make me feel I must be wrong and must rush over and become a Zombie, too. Who knows. Who cares? Whatever they are thinking — they are WRONG!

It reads: “We are the largest grassroots movement organizing every day to knock down those roadblocks, one by one.”

They call people in Congress — who are actually representing their constituents — roadblocks?

They are going to knock them down one by one? Really? And just what’s the plan? How are they going to do that? Will they pull a Harry Reid on the roadblock Congress people? You know… throw some “misinformation” out there about the person, in an attempt to challenge his or her credibility?

It goes on…”We have an aggressive plan for the months ahead — that’s because building the kind of organization that can stand up to the powerful interests and the obstruction -focused members of Congress takes a lot of grassroots power.”

Takes a lot of arrogance, too.

The “powerful interests” in this situation happens to be you and me and anyone else that is a citizen. People have spoken and some Congress members are actually doing what they are supposed to be doing — LISTENING & ACTING ON THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. Then we have this grassroots group that is going to aggressively knock down any of these Congress members who have dared represent their districts… who have dared represent US and our wishes?

Am I to be impressed or something?

Oh… oh… and then they put… “Since we launched ___, we haven’t slowed down. You’re the reason for that…”

Beg pardon?

I’m what?

I think they have mistaken me for someone else. I deserve no credit for their existence or anything they have done or attempted to do, nor do I want any. As a matter of fact, I consider their efforts to be insulting to the American citizens and representative of nothing more than “Bully Power”!

Government isn’t supposed to be a playground with everyone going around, “Let’s pretend this is true…” or “Let’s pretend these are the facts…” or “Let’s pretend I’m the good guy and you are the bad guy…” This is REAL LIFE and REAL LIVE PEOPLE are being affected by decisions being made. Needless to say — the games need to stop! The games need to stop and people need to take a REAL look at what is taking place right in their face!

The “roadblocks” are Congressmen & Women, who are listening and responding to those they are representing. How dare anyone suggest to remove them one by one. That sounds like a threat!

Oh, that ticks me off…

No Commandeering Invited or Allowed

September 21, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

The article, Why Does My “Invisible Friend” Bother You So Much, has resulted in a touch of frustration, entertainment of the day, and pure validation. Yes, validation. Validation of what so many of us have come to see as the new reality people are attempting to impose upon the masses. To suggest many of us are tired of it, is the understatement of the century. It’s old. It’s used up. It’s a game no longer selling with ease, as the boycott membership swiftly grows.

Why Does My “Invisible Friend” Bother You So Much was dealing with the need of SOME to get rid of anything and everything that suggests Christianity, while either supporting, or ignoring, rude & lewd behavior in public (possibly in front of children). And, let’s not forget the Mosque/Islamic “exception” and demand for tolerance not afforded the Christian churches, though they (the Muslims), too, have an “Invisible Friend”.

Rather than deal with the topic at hand, the reaction was an attempt to slide the discussion elsewhere and totally away from the point.

I did not ask why people didn’t simply believe in God. I asked why it bothered them so much that they had to remove any sign of my “Invisible Friend” from view, while demanding tolerance for the Muslims and their “Invisible Friend”? What did (and do) they fear that they can’t simply let Christian believers believe? What did (do) they fear that made, and makes, it necessary to demand removal and exclusion of anything thing that resembles Christianity, while often promoting (with a passion) anything that is non-Christian or blatantly against Christianity?

A person tried to get into a conversation about the wrongful things that happened in the guise of Christianity, but… that wasn’t the topic.

I kept trying to remind the person what the topic was. It was useless.

It was suggested that I am delusional. I was asked if I was stupid. Well, most readers know the drill and how the conversation went – ‘cause it was like they always go. It was also suggested that I made it all up. Straw man illusion, if you will. No one was actually trying to take away anything and everything that might suggest a Christian theme. So, I presented an article dealing with a Christmas tree ban.

Needless to say, but I will…

The person, at times throughout the conversation, responded by repeating a particularly offensive word over and over. (Now there’s an intelligent argument.)

Likewise, the person said that I had failed to address all that he/she presented about Christianity, but I had dared to bring up a Christmas tree ban. Then there was the laughing and so forth as he attempted to mock me. EXCEPT… things such as a Christmas tree ban was the major point of the particular article. Yes, In regard to the article, Why Does My “Invisible Friend” Bother You So Much — Christmas tree banning was quite relevant to the issue presented.

Straw man illusion? Wouldn’t that apply to someone pretending to be rational, while trying to commandeer a discussion and ignoring the actual question presented? And yes… wouldn’t that apply to that same someone who was suggesting no one is trying to remove signs of Christianity except maybe from schools? Oh, and wouldn’t that apply to that same person who was trying to tell me the point of the article? You know, the article I personally thought up and wrote all on my own without his input or guidance? (Somehow, I think I am the most qualified to know what point I was trying to make. Whether I made it or not, is an entirely different issue.)

My question again with the examples spelled out for the little mocker types, who deny even the obvious when it doesn’t fit their agenda…

Why Does My “Invisible Friend” Bother You So Much that there is a problem with having a Christmas tree or saying something so simple as, “Merry Christmas”? What is it that is feared? What is it that you fear — that makes all these things so dangerous to you that you can’t just let them be? Why is it necessary to remove and destroy anything you feel is even remotely related to my “Invisible Friend”, while promoting tolerance for the Muslims or the rude and the lewd?

That is the question. No commandeering invited or allowed.

Why Does My “Invisible Friend” Bother You So Much

September 14, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

I can’t help but wonder why my “Invisible Friend” bothers you so very much. It isn’t as though I’m requiring you to talk to him, nor do I drag you to church and force you to sit next to me in the pew pretending you are. So just what is it that so upsets you about me having my “Invisible Friend” that you have to mock and insult and try to take away anything that might remind you that there are many people, who are friends with my “Invisible Friend”?

Do you likewise mock the people who are acting rude and lewd in public, or do you cheer them on and defend their right to flaunt their sexuality all over the place? Oh, that’s right, instead you mock my “Invisible Friend” and me for daring to feel the public display is inappropriate.

Do you likewise mock the Muslims for their Islamic beliefs and for having an “Invisible Friend”, too? I didn’t think so. You wouldn’t dare. You’re too chicken to mock them, because you know some don’t take such mockery lightly and do play for keeps and forever. So, instead, you spend your energy lecturing that everyone should be tolerant and embrace a Mosque being built at the Twin Tower site or some other such place that might be considered an insult to some non-Muslims, while demanding the Ten Commandment tablet be removed immediately from the public square.

I don’t force you to stand with me and talk to my “Invisible Friend”, but you strive to silence my ability to talk with him or about him, except in the shadows hidden from your sight and hearing.

What is it that makes you willing to embrace anything non-Christian and destroy anything that is? What is it that makes you so desperately in need of destroying all the reminders of my “Invisible Friend”? Why not consider it art and mythology and leave it at that? What is it that you fear — that perhaps my invisible friend isn’t a myth after all?

Common Sense vs The Now Common Behavior

September 14, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

It appears that the Holder Fast & Furious contempt case remains on hold, as everyone waits on a judge’s ruling.

So does that mean that Holder is on leave pending the outcome?

No.

If a cashier was caught stealing from his boss, would the boss leave him at the cash register, until a judge ruled on his guilt or innocence?

If a nurse was caught harming patients, would the supervisor keep scheduling the accused to work shifts caring for patients, while waiting on a judge to rule?

If a fast food employee was caught poisoning food, would the boss keep him preparing and serving food, while waiting on a judge to make a decision?

If a police officer was caught stopping cars and robbing the drivers, would the Police Chief keep the officer on traffic duty, as a judge ponders a decision?

If a prosecutor was caught doctoring evidence, would he be allowed to handle cases, while waiting on a judge to rule on his?

Then why is Eric Holder acting as Attorney General and making decisions on who will and won’t be prosecuted for whatever his heart desires, while someone waits on a judge to rule?

Does this then mean that the boss, knowing what Holder has been caught doing, is complicit or is it short-sightedness? Either way, there is a question we all should ask and ponder upon…

Where is the common sense in this now common behavior? Do we simply accept that there is none and go on about our business?

What do you think?

Embarrassed Yet: The People Want to Know

September 14, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Well, Congress, many things have been left up to you as representatives of “We the People”. Sadly, many of you did it your way in spite of all the outcries and questions that loomed right in front of you. The people weren’t smart enough. The people weren’t aware of all the facts. The people were over-reacting. The politics and political careers out-weighed any of the bad stuff the people might be enduring. And that is only a portion of it all and many of you know it.

It is to the many of you that I address this…

You are in Washington, DC and you didn’t know (or believe) the IRS was targeting the Tea Party or Christian groups?

You didn’t know about the New Black Panthers intimidating voters and that it was ignored?

You didn’t have a clue about Fast & Furious?

You didn’t know that video line was a hoax, when an excuse was thrown out there for the Benghazi attack and the failure to act?

You didn’t know about the spying on journalists?

You didn’t know about problems with NSA, until Snowden announced it to the world?

You didn’t know that Holder was held in contempt?

You didn’t know the president wrongly inserted himself into the Professor Gates & Trayvon Martin cases, stirring racial tension?

You didn’t know that no one was allowed to disagree with the president or his administration least they be called racist?

You didn’t know that Sandy Hook — a tragedy — was utilized for political gain and an attempt to gun grab?

You didn’t know that people were bragging about having voted more than once?

You didn’t know that Henry Reid campaigned against Romney with an untruth when he claimed the candidate hadn’t paid taxes?

Where were you that you didn’t know these and other things that happened on your watch?

The world has been watching.

The world has been paying attention.

The world has been wondering at your lack of integrity and backbone.

Are you embarrassed yet?

You should be!

Stop the Bullying: The One-sided Affair

September 8, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

I’m not going to mince words. I’m tired of the radical agenda driven peoples, claiming special consideration for gay teens, while then claiming they are fighting “bullying” of teens. No, you aren’t. You are fighting the bullying of specific groups — not bullying itself.

That’s wrong!

That’s as wrong as the act of bullying.

Let’s have some real discussion here…

Gay teens are bullied? Only gay teens? Yeah, right!

If the supposed grown-ups would fight the act of bullying — then it would be a fight to stop bullying of all. That would include gays. However, when only gays are the protected group of kids — it not only leaves out the other bullied kids, it adds to those who are. It is, after all, a protection at the expense of others. What part of this picture can’t these activists see or comprehend? Or, is it that it doesn’t matter to them? Is it that it doesn’t fit their true agenda of promotion?

It doesn’t matter if gay teens have been bullied for a hundred years — so have the nerds and others — that doesn’t make this wrongness any righter.

A woman said to me that it is a matter of “respect”. Yeah, and people should be taught to be respectful just because they should be respectful. There should be no need to isolate the gays into some special group that everyone must respect, while not demanding the same respect for all others be returned.

I tried to make the point to one person, that teens, who do not believe in open sexuality, should not be forced to “embrace” open homosexuality. They shouldn’t be forced to take part in things such as “Gay Pride Day”, or, if they are, that they are then the ones being bullied. And we don’t get this because?

Oh, it doesn’t fit the true agenda?

From what I have seen of Gay Pride parades, it is a show of perversion — and a demand of that “in your face” perversion being accepted or else — not individuals attempting to show they are like everyone else. Nope! It’s shock and hostility at it’s best.

It appears that teens are being taught they have a “right” to be rude and lewd in public. It appears they are being taught that if someone is offended by the public rude and lewd behavior, that person is an intolerant enemy to be punished. After all, how dare someone think “certain behavior” is inappropriate in public no matter who is involved in the performance?

A man once told me that all he and his activist friends wanted was to be treated equally. Fine, then accept the consequences equally for the “behavior” that is not acceptable in a public setting. Stop doing the “in your face, I dare you to say or do anything” actions, while then crying intolerance because someone was offended. Stop demanding special treatment, especially at the expense of others.

Not everyone likes my hair color or the way I wear it. Are they intolerant? Shouldn’t they be forced to love it? Shouldn’t we have a Carrie’s Hair Day at school each year? That will force everyone to be more tolerant of my hair, won’t it? Ridiculous? Well, so is a day celebrating homosexuality.

It’s one thing to teach teens they are special and to be there for them during those rough years, but quite another to indoctrinate them into the world of hostility and victimhood, and suggesting they now have rights they don’t afford others. They have the right to be intolerant while demanding tolerance. They have a right to behave in public as though they walked out of an XXX rated movie, while in a “G” public setting. That’s wrong! That’s simply wrong!

If I saw a teen (or anyone) being bullied, I would step-in (or call for help) to stop it. I wouldn’t even be thinking “why” the bullying was taking place. That’s because I see bullying as wrong regardless of the victim of it. Not so for some of those I speak of. These so-called righteous activists, seem to think it’s quite okay to bully the Christian teens because they don’t want to take part in something they feel is offensive — a Sex Day at school — while supposedly crying out against bullying.

I don’t see these activists, I speak of, doing the kids any favors at all. They aren’t teaching kids self-respect and how to be respectful to others. They are teaching hate, hostility, victim-hood, lewdness, rudeness, self-centeredness, blindness,deafness, intolerance, disrespect for self and a life centered around “sex”, rather than centered around self and all that the person can be. Sex first — all else later, if ever.

Yes, let’s stop the bullying, some activists say, as though the ONLY victims are, or have ever been, gay teens. Yes, let’s stop the bullying for ALL, unless they happen to be Christian teens (for example), who don’t want to take part in a celebration of sexuality (that has no business being in the school experience anyway). Now, in that case, it is quite okay to bully them, call them names and demand they give up their beliefs or else. Yep, that’s different. It’s also why this is a one-sided affair. An affair that has little to do with an attempt to stop bullying because bullying is wrong in and of itself, but rather — stop the bullying of a select group ONLY, even if it is at the expense of other teens.

Yes, these activists worry so much about the “bullying of teens” and how it so negatively impacts them. Well, if they are gay teens that is. Christian teens being bullied and vilified is, in this one-sided affair, quite a different story. So, I guess this alleged “anti-bullying” movement isn’t really about “anti-bullying” after all, is it?

Dark Ravens Rise

September 2, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

Dark ravens rise in mocking flight as snarls do hiss and serpents coil. There is no babe in comfort held. All lies are truth and truth are lies. The cries of old in silence held. A mother’s arms no longer are. A babe in life now twists in death – the hope all gone… no breath to see… cold stillness of pain surpassed … tomorrows to never be.

The naked womb in haunted shame, echoes cries of tortured screams. How often did the baby plead for a mother’s arms to stop the deed and simply give a chance to be?

Did she know?… did she care?… was there a moment she thought to dare and give a chance for this little life to be?

Or… did the lies rise up to snare still another doubting soul in guise of right and righteousness that is not so and few do see?

A right that makes it good to take a little life in glee breeds serpents tongues and crickets shame to sing upon the world of he and all that be.

A tiny soul in limbo rests while memories haunt and deeds devour the inhumane of selfish ways whose dark voices cry in thought of only “me” and “my” and “I”.

There is no rest for tortured ones as they desperately do wander in search… always in search… of what they can not find… nor ever shall, you see. For it was a tiny soul clinging to a cold womb who held the light and sparked the fire of what we call humanity.

In One We Are No More

September 1, 2013 by Carrie K. Hutchens

The picture painted to distort and deceive, it’s nothing such as it ever seems.

The words of old twisted and rushed, say so much and mean so little.

The world of hope a ploy conceived and given as a gem none shall ever see.

No time to beckon. No time to cry. It’s over now. No dreams remain. What was is not and what was not is. The confusion and delusions invade and become, as tomorrow is forgotten and the future becomes void in a clone of only one.

None beyond one.

Only one.

Just one to be and behold.

A spirit rages. It speaks and demands.

Alas, the plan of one is dimming in the light.

We are no more as once we were, but neither are we one as they wished us to be. For there is a gem to see and a gem to be as we become the nightmare of the collective ones, who now have learned — our souls are our own and never for sale, nor a gift given unto them ever this day, nor even beyond.

Yes, our souls are our own, as they, in conclusion and confusion, walk sadly away from us as one and only one, for in their world of singleness there are none beyond one.